Description
dYdX aims to build a powerful and professional exchange for trading crypto assets where users can truly own their trades and, eventually, the exchange itself.
If you find something wrong on this page you can submit an issue or edit the information.
Risk analysis
State validation
ZK proofs (ST)ZK-STARKS are zero knowledge proofs that ensure state correctness.
Data availability
On chainAll of the data needed for proof construction is published on chain.
Upgradeability
YesThe code that secures the system can be changed arbitrarily and without notice.
Sequencer failure
Force trade/exit to L1The user can force the sequencer to include a trade or withdrawal transaction by submitting a request through L1. The user is required to find a counterparty for the trade by out of system means. If the sequencer is down, the user can use the exit hatch to withdraw funds.
Validator failure
Escape hatch (MP)Users are able to trustlessly exit their collateral by submitting a merkle proof of funds. Positions will be closed using average price from the last batch state update.
Technology
Validity proofs ensure state correctness
Each update to the system state must be accompanied by a ZK Proof that ensures that the new state was derived by correctly applying a series of valid user transactions to the previous state. Once the proof is processed on the Ethereum blockchain the L2 block is instantly finalized. The system state is represented using Merkle roots.
Zero knowledge STARK cryptography is used
Despite their production use ZK-STARKs proof systems are still relatively new, complex and they rely on the proper implementation of the polynomial constraints used to check validity of the Execution Trace.
Funds can be lost if the proof system is implemented incorrectly.
All data required for proofs is published on chain
All the relevant data that is used to recover the L2 balances Merkle Tree is published on-chain as calldata. This includes, in addition to the proven new state, the complete list of differences of the users' balances from the previous state.
Operator
The system has a centralized operator
The operator is the only entity that can propose blocks. A live and trustworthy operator is vital to the health of the system. Typically, the Operator is the hot wallet of the StarkEx service submitting state updates for which proofs have been already submitted and verified.
MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.
Users can force exit the system
Force exit allows the users to escape censorship by withdrawing their funds. The system allows users to force the withdrawal of funds by submitting a request directly to the contract on-chain. The request must be served within a defined time period. If this does not happen, the system will halt regular operation and permit trustless withdrawal of funds. Perpetual positions can also be force closed before withdrawing, however this requires the user to find the counterparty for the trade themselves.
Users can be censored if the operator refuses to include their transactions. They can still exit the system.
Funds can be lost if the user is unable to find the counterparty for the force trade.
Withdrawals
Regular exit
The user initiates the withdrawal by submitting a transaction on L2. When the block containing that transaction is proven the funds become available for withdrawal on L1. Finally the user submits an L1 transaction to claim the funds. This transaction does not require a merkle proof.
Forced exit
If the user experiences censorship from the operator with regular exit they can submit their withdrawal requests directly on L1. The system is then obliged to service this request. Once the force operation is submitted if the request is serviced the operation follows the flow of a regular exit.
Emergency exit
If enough time passes and the forced exit is still ignored the user can put the system into a frozen state, disallowing further state updates. In that case everybody can withdraw by submitting a merkle proof of their funds with their L1 transaction.
Permissioned Addresses
The system uses the following set of permissioned addresses:
Defines rules of governance via the dYdX token. Can upgrade implementation of the rollup, potentially gaining access to all funds stored in the bridge. Currently there is no delay before the upgrade, so the users will not have time to migrate.
Can upgrade implementation of Verifier, potentially with code approving fraudulent state. Currently there is no delay before the upgrade, so the users will not have time to migrate.
Allowed to update state of the rollup. When Operator is down the state cannot be updated.
Smart Contracts

The system consists of the following smart contracts:
Main contract of dYdX exchange. Updates dYdX state and verifies its integrity using STARK Verifier. Allows users to deposit and withdraw tokens via normal and emergency modes. This contract stores the following tokens: USDC.
STARK Verifier. In contrast to Sorare, ImmutableX, rhino.fi and StarkNet which use common SHARP Prover, dYdX uses seperate Prover/Verifier.
Contract storing CAIRO Program Output, in case of dYdX, it stores state diffs of dYdX Exchange.
Part of STARK Verifier.
Part of STARK Verifier.
The current deployment carries some associated risks:
Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is no delay on code upgrades (CRITICAL).
Milestones
dYdX v4 announcement
2022 Jun 22nd
dYdX V4 will be developed as a standalone blockchain based on the Cosmos SDK.
Learn moredYdX Foundation
2021 Aug 3rd
Independent foundation was created to participate in the Protocol governance.
Learn morePublic launch
2021 Apr 6th
Layer 2 cross-margined Perpetuals are now live in production for all traders.
Learn more