Search for projects by name
Mantle is an under development EVM compatible Optimium, based on the OP Stack.
Mantle is an under development EVM compatible Optimium, based on the OP Stack.
The project will be classified as "Other" due to its specific risks that set it apart from the standard classifications.
The project will move to Others because:
Consequence: projects without a proper proof system fully rely on single entities to safely update the state. A malicious proposer can finalize an invalid state, which can cause loss of funds.
Consequence: projects without a sufficiently decentralized data availability committee rely on few entities to safely attest data availability on Ethereum. A small set of entities can collude with the proposer to finalize an unavailable state, which can cause loss of funds.
2024 Feb 22 — 2025 Feb 21
2024 Feb 22 — 2025 Feb 20
Currently the system permits invalid state roots. More details in project overview.
Proof construction and state derivation rely fully on data that is NOT published on chain. Mantle DA contracts are forked from EigenDA with significant modifications, most importantly removal of slashing conditions. DA fraud proof mechanism is not live yet.
There is no window for users to exit in case of an unwanted regular upgrade since contracts are instantly upgradable.
Only the whitelisted proposers can publish state roots on L1, so in the event of failure the withdrawals are frozen.
OP Stack projects can use the OP fault proof system, already being deployed on some. This project though is not using fault proofs yet and is relying on the honesty of the permissioned Proposer and Challengers to ensure state correctness. The smart contract system permits invalid state roots.
Funds can be stolen if an invalid state root is submitted to the system (CRITICAL).
The transaction data is not recorded on the Ethereum main chain. The sequencer posts the transactions data batch root, and then propagates the data to off-chain permissioned nodes to sign. It subsequently posts the nodes signatures on chain to verify they belong to the specified members of the quorum, and that the minimum stake threshold is met.
Funds can be lost if the external data becomes unavailable (CRITICAL).
Mantle DA is a data availability solution built on EigenDA contracts, which have been forked and significantly modified.
There is no fraud detection mechanism in place. A data withholding attack can only be detected by nodes downloading the full data from the DA layer.
There is no delay in the upgradeability of the bridge. Users have no time to exit the system before the bridge implementation update is completed.
The relayer role is permissioned, and the DA bridge does not have a Security Council or a governance mechanism to propose new relayers. In case of relayer failure, the DA bridge will halt and be unable to recover without the intervention of a centralized entity.
Mantle DA is an independent DA module that is built on top of an early version of EigenDA smart contracts.
The system is made up of two main component: onchain smart contracts for storing and verifying data commitments, and an offchain network of permissioned nodes storing the data.
The permissioned set of nodes is tasked with providing data availability to the Mantle network.
They receive Mantle network transaction data, sign it using a BLS signature scheme, and send back signatures to the sequencer to post commitments to the DataLayrServiceManager (DA Bridge) contract on Ethereum.
The DA DataLayrServiceManager acts as a verifier smart contract, verifying that the signatures provided by the sequencer are indeed from node operators who have agreed to be in the quorum.
To become members of the DA network, node operators are required to stake 100,000 MNT tokens, and can only be registered by an authorized entity. There is no slashing mechanism in place for misbehaving nodes.
The DA bridge contract is used for storing transaction data headers and confirming the data store by verifying operators signatures. The Mantle sequencer posts the data hash as a commitment to the DataLayrServiceManager contract on Ethereum through an InitDataStore() transaction. Once the commitment is posted, the sequencer sends the data to the permissioned set of nodes, who sign the data and send back the signatures to the sequencer. The sequencer then posts the signatures to the DataLayrServiceManager contract on Ethereum through a confirmDataStore() transaction. The confirmDataStore() function verify the signatures and if the quorum is reached, the data is considered available.
The operator is the only entity that can propose blocks. A live and trustworthy operator is vital to the health of the system.
MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.
Because the state of the system is based on transactions submitted on the underlying host chain and anyone can submit their transactions there it allows the users to circumvent censorship by interacting with the smart contract on the host chain directly.
The user initiates L2->L1 messages by submitting a regular transaction on this chain. When the block containing that transaction is settled, the message becomes available for processing on L1. The process of block finalization takes a challenge period of 7d to complete.
Funds can be frozen if the centralized validator goes down. Users cannot produce blocks themselves and exiting the system requires new block production (CRITICAL).
If the user experiences censorship from the operator with regular L2->L1 messaging they can submit their messages directly on L1. The system is then obliged to service this request or halt all messages, including forced withdrawals from L1 and regular messages initiated on L2. Once the force operation is submitted and if the request is serviced, the operation follows the flow of a regular message.
OP stack chains are pursuing the EVM Equivalence model. No changes to smart contracts are required regardless of the language they are written in, i.e. anything deployed on L1 can be deployed on L2.
Allowed to challenge or delete state roots proposed by a Proposer.
Allowed to pause deposits and withdrawals.
Allowed to post new state roots of the current layer to the host chain.
Allowed to commit transactions from the current layer to the host chain.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Is allowed to interact with BLSRegistry - sign data commitments for the DA bridge.
Can be used to upgrade implementation of L1MantleToken.
This contract stores the number of Mantle DA operators and their public keys. It also store the quorum threshold and the minimum stake required to be part of the quorum.
Contract managing different investment strategies, forked from EigenLayer StrategyManager.
Can be used to upgrade implementation of InvestmentManager, MantleSecondStrat, RegistryPermission, MantleFirstStrat, Delegation.
Contains a list of proposed state roots which Proposers assert to be a result of block execution. Currently only the PROPOSER address can submit new state roots.
Can be used to upgrade implementation of BLSRegistry, DataLayrServiceManager, PubkeyCompendium, DataLayrChallenge, DataLayrChallengeUtils.
This contract is the main entry point for data availability. It is responsible for storing transaction data headers and confirming the data store by verifying operators signatures.
Sends messages from host chain to this chain, and relays messages back onto host chain. In the event that a message sent from host chain to this chain is rejected for exceeding this chain’s epoch gas limit, it can be resubmitted via this contract’s replay function.
Legacy contract used to manage a mapping of string names to addresses. Modern OP stack uses a different standard proxy system instead, but this contract is still necessary for backwards compatibility with several older contracts.
The main entry point to deposit ERC20 tokens from host chain to this chain. This contract can store any token.
Basic do-nothing investment strategy.
The main entry point to deposit funds from host chain to this chain. It also allows to prove and finalize withdrawals. This contract stores the following tokens: ETH, MNT.
Basic do-nothing investment strategy.
Main entry point for users depositing ERC20 token that do not require custom gateway.
Main entry point for users depositing ETH, MNT.
The current deployment carries some associated risks:
Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is no delay on code upgrades (CRITICAL).