Search for projects by name or address
ZKSwap is a fork of ZKsync with added AMM functionality. Based on ZK Rollup technology, ZKSwap aims to execute the full functionality of Uniswap on Layer 2, but increase the TPS, and make transaction processing cheaper.
ZKSwap is a fork of ZKsync with added AMM functionality. Based on ZK Rollup technology, ZKSwap aims to execute the full functionality of Uniswap on Layer 2, but increase the TPS, and make transaction processing cheaper.
Users can force the sequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs. to include a transaction by submitting a request through L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development.. If the sequencer censors or is down for , users can use the exit hatch to withdraw their funds.
SNARKs are succinct zero knowledge proofs that ensure state correctness, but require trusted setupGeneration of a piece of data that must then be used for some cryptographic protocol to run. Generating this data requires some secret information. The "trust" comes from the fact the secret must be destroyed after the ceremony, otherwise cryptographic properties of the protocol could be broken. Once the data is generated, and the secrets are forgotten, no further participation from the creators of the ceremony is required. There are two types of trusted setups for SNARKs: (i) trusted setup per circuit where it is generated from scratch for each circuit, (ii) trusted universal setup per proving system where it can be used for several circuits..
All of the data needed for proof construction is published on Ethereum L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development..
Some contracts are not verified, so there is no way to assess the exit windowThe amount of time that users have to exit a system before an unwanted upgrade. It takes into account upgrade delays, forced transaction delays and other time factors. To be considered Stage 1, a rollup needs to have an exit window of at least 7d if upgrades are initiated by a permissioned actor less decentralized than a Security Council. For Stage 2, a rollup needs at least 30d in all cases outside of onchain provable bugs..
Users are able to trustlessly exit by submitting a zero knowledge proof of funds.
All the data that is used to construct the system state is published onchain in the form of cheap calldata. This ensures that it will always be available when needed.
Each update to the system state must be accompanied by a ZK proof that ensures that the new state was derived by correctly applying a series of valid user transactions to the previous state. These proofs are then verified on Ethereum by a smart contract.
Discovery rerun on the same block number with only config-related changes.
Discovery rerun on the same block number with only config-related changes.
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract UpgradeGatekeeper (0x0DCCe462ddEA102D3ecf84A991d3ecFC251e02C7) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract Verifier (0x42F15EFE22993C88441EF3467f2E6Fa8FFA9ADef) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ZkSync (0x6dE5bDC580f55Bc9dAcaFCB67b91674040A247e3) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract Governance (0x86E527BC3C43E6Ba3eFf3A8CAd54A7Ed09cD8E8B) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ZkSwapListing (0xb3BFC153d60f51Fb10E69B04f5f7D2735fA0619E) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract VerifierExit (0xb56878d21F6b101f48bb55f1AA9D3F624f04E513) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ZkSyncExit (0xC0221a4Dfb792AA71CE84C2687b1D2b1E7D3eea0) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract UniswapV2Factory (0xD2cbDcd7C6b3152BdFf6549C208052E4DBcd575D) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ZkSyncCommitBlock (0xE26Ebb18144CD2d8DCB14cE87fdCfbEb81baCAD4) | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract Zks Token (0xe4815AE53B124e7263F08dcDBBB757d41Ed658c6) | |
| +++ description: None | |
The operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. is the only entity that can propose blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over.. A live and trustworthy operator is vital to the health of the system.
MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.
Force exit allows the users to escape censorship by withdrawing their funds. The system allows users to force the withdrawal of funds by submitting a request directly to the contract onchain. The request must be served within a defined time period. If this does not happen, the system will halt regular operation and permit trustless withdrawal of funds.
Users can be censored if the operator refuses to include their transactions. However, there exists a mechanism to independently exit the system.
The user initiates the withdrawal by submitting a regular transaction on this chain. When the blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. containing that transaction is settled the funds become available for withdrawal on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development.. ZK proofs are required to settle blocks. Finally the user submits an L1 transaction to claim the funds.
If the user experiences censorship from the operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. with regular exit they can submit their withdrawal requests directly on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development.. The system is then obliged to service this request. Once the force operation is submitted and if the request is serviced, the operation follows the flow of a regular exit.
If the enough time deadline passes and the forced exit is still ignored the user can put the system into Exodus Mode, disallowing further state updates. In that case everybody can withdraw by submitting a zero knowledge proof of their funds with their L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. transaction.
Funds can be lost if the user is unable to generate the non-trivial ZK proof for exodus withdraw.

This address is the master of Upgrade Gatekeeper contract, which is allowed to perform upgrades for Governance, VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover., VerifierExit, PairManager and ZkSync contracts.
This actor is allowed to propose, revert and execute L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development.. A list of active validatorsIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier is kept inside Governance contract and can be updated by zkSwap 2.0 Admin.


The main RollupA blockchain that inherits consensus and data availability from another blockchain called L1. Rollups enable trust minimized bridges with the base layer via proof systems, either optimistic or zero-knowledge. A rollup without a bridge, or without considering the bridge, is called a sovereign rollup. contract. OperatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. commits blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over., provides ZK proof which is validated by the VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contract and process withdrawals (executes blocks). Users deposit ETH and ERC20 tokens. This contract defines the upgrade delay in the UPGRADE_NOTICE_PERIOD constant that is currently set to 8 days.
Additional contract to store implementation details of the main ZkSync contract.
The source code of this contract is not verified on Etherscan.
Keeps a list of blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. producers and whitelisted tokens.
Manages trading pairs.
zkSNARK PlonkA zk-SNARK proving system introduced by Gabizon, Williamson and Ciobotaru in 2019 that allows proving custom circuits. Plonk is based on KZG polynomial commitments and thus requires a universal trusted setup. VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover..
The source code of this contract is not verified on Etherscan.
The source code of this contract is not verified on Etherscan.
The current deployment carries some associated risks:
Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is a 8 days delay on code upgrades.
Funds can be stolen if the source code of unverified contracts contains malicious code (CRITICAL).