Search

Search for projects by name

Kinto logoKinto

Badges

About

Kinto is an Orbit stack L2 with account abstraction and KYC enabled for all users, supporting both modern financial institutions and decentralized protocols.


Value secured
$56.55 M20.6%
Canonically Bridged
$437.30 K
Externally Bridged
$56.11 M
Natively Minted
$0.00

  • Tokens
  • Past day UOPS
    0.03165%
  • 30D ops count
    45.32 K

  • Stage
  • Type
    Optimistic Rollup
  • Purpose
    KYC-ed DeFi
  • Sequencer failureState validationData availabilityExit windowProposer failure

    Badges

    About

    Kinto is an Orbit stack L2 with account abstraction and KYC enabled for all users, supporting both modern financial institutions and decentralized protocols.

    Value Secured

    2024 Feb 22 — 2025 Feb 21

    Activity

    2024 Feb 22 — 2025 Feb 20

    Onchain costs

    The section shows the operating costs that L2s pay to Ethereum.


    2024 Feb 21 — 2025 Feb 20


    Milestones & Incidents

    Security Council Governance

    2024 Nov 3rd

    Kinto gives the ownership of all L1 system contracts to a Security Council that is properly set up.

    Learn more

    First ever Challenge on mainnet

    2024 Oct 31st

    The first correctly resolved fault proof challenge of a mainnet Orbit stack rollup.

    Learn more
    Risk summary
    Fraud proof system is fully deployed but is not yet permissionless as it requires Validators to be whitelisted.
    Risk analysis
    Fraud proof system is fully deployed but is not yet permissionless as it requires Validators to be whitelisted.
    Sequencer failureState validationData availabilityExit windowProposer failure

    Sequencer failure

    Self sequence

    In the event of a sequencer failure, users can force transactions to be included in the project’s chain by sending them to L1. There can be up to a 1d delay on this operation.

    State validation

    Fraud proofs (INT)

    Fraud proofs allow 5 WHITELISTED actors watching the chain to prove that the state is incorrect. At least 5 Challengers are external to the Operator. Interactive proofs (INT) require multiple transactions over time to resolve. There is a 6d 8h challenge period.

    Data availability

    Onchain

    All of the data needed for proof construction is published on Ethereum L1.

    Exit window

    None

    There is no window for users to exit in case of an unwanted regular upgrade since contracts are instantly upgradable.

    Proposer failure

    Self propose

    Anyone can become a Proposer after 12d 17h of inactivity from the currently whitelisted Proposers.

    Rollup stageKintoKinto is a
    Stage 0
    Appchain
    Optimistic Rollup.

    Rollup operators cannot compromise the system, but being application-specific might bring additional risk.

    Kinto enforces the use of smart wallets and KYC. A valid state transition in Kinto disallows all contract calls by EOAs and new contract creation, unless specifically whitelisted. This setup effectively enforces smart wallet use because the auxiliary contracts of the standard KintoWallet smart wallet (like the EntryPoint and the KintoWalletFactory) are whitelisted. The KYC validation is part of the KintoWallet signature verification. Since all users must use the same implementation of this smart wallet, all user transactions on Kinto check for an up-to-date KYC flag, and are dropped in case the check fails.

    Note:
    We're still in the process of formalizing how to properly integrate appchains in the Stages framework.

    Learn more about Rollup stages
    Please keep in mind that these stages do not reflect rollup security, this is an opinionated assessment of rollup maturity based on subjective criteria, created with a goal of incentivizing projects to push toward better decentralization. Each team may have taken different paths to achieve this goal.
    Technology

    All data required for proofs is published on chain

    All the data that is used to construct the system state is published on chain in the form of cheap blobs or calldata. This ensures that it will be available for enough time.

    1. Sequencing followed by deterministic execution - Arbitrum documentation
    2. SequencerInbox.sol - source code, addSequencerL2BatchFromOrigin function
    Learn more about the DA layer here: Ethereum logoEthereum
    State validation
    A diagram of the state validation
    A diagram of the state validation

    Updates to the system state can be proposed and challenged by a set of whitelisted validators. If a state root passes the challenge period, it is optimistically considered correct and made actionable for withdrawals.


    State root proposals

    Whitelisted validators propose state roots as children of a previous state root. A state root can have multiple conflicting children. This structure forms a graph, and therefore, in the contracts, state roots are referred to as nodes. Each proposal requires a stake, currently set to 0.1 ETH, that can be slashed if the proposal is proven incorrect via a fraud proof. Stakes can be moved from one node to one of its children, either by calling stakeOnExistingNode or stakeOnNewNode. New nodes cannot be created faster than the minimum assertion period by the same validator, currently set to 15m. The oldest unconfirmed node can be confirmed if the challenge period has passed and there are no siblings, and rejected if the parent is not a confirmed node or if the challenge period has passed and no one is staked on it.

    • Funds can be stolen if none of the whitelisted verifiers checks the published state. Fraud proofs assume at least one honest and able validator (CRITICAL).

    1. How is fraud proven - Arbitrum documentation FAQ
    Challenges

    A challenge can be started between two siblings, i.e. two different state roots that share the same parent, by calling the startChallenge function. Validators cannot be in more than one challenge at the same time, meaning that the protocol operates with partial concurrency. Since each challenge lasts 6d 8h, this implies that the protocol can be subject to delay attacks, where a malicious actor can delay withdrawals as long as they are willing to pay the cost of losing their stakes. If the protocol is delayed attacked, the new stake requirement increases exponentially for each challenge period of delay. Challenges are played via a bisection game, where asserter and challenger play together to find the first instruction of disagreement. Such instruction is then executed onchain in the WASM OneStepProver contract to determine the winner, who then gets half of the stake of the loser. As said before, a state root is rejected only when no one left is staked on it. The protocol does not enforces valid bisections, meaning that actors can propose correct initial claim and then provide incorrect midpoints.

    1. Fraud Proof Wars: Arbitrum Classic
    Operator

    The system has a centralized sequencer

    While forcing transaction is open to anyone the system employs a privileged sequencer that has priority for submitting transaction batches and ordering transactions.

    • MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.

    1. Sequencer - Arbitrum documentation

    Users can force any transaction

    Because the state of the system is based on transactions submitted on the underlying host chain and anyone can submit their transactions there it allows the users to circumvent censorship by interacting with the smart contract on the host chain directly. After a delay of 1d in which a Sequencer has failed to include a transaction that was directly posted to the smart contract, it can be forcefully included by anyone on the host chain, which finalizes its ordering.

    1. SequencerInbox.sol - source code, forceInclusion function
    2. Sequencer Isn’t Doing Its Job - Arbitrum documentation
    Withdrawals

    Regular messaging

    The user initiates L2->L1 messages by submitting a regular transaction on this chain. When the block containing that transaction is settled, the message becomes available for processing on L1. The process of block finalization usually takes several days to complete.

    1. Transaction lifecycle - Arbitrum documentation
    2. L2 to L1 Messages - Arbitrum documentation
    3. Mainnet for everyone - Arbitrum Blog

    Autonomous exit

    Users can (eventually) exit the system by pushing the transaction on L1 and providing the corresponding state root. The only way to prevent such withdrawal is via an upgrade.

    Other considerations

    Enforced smart wallets and KYC

    The Kinto L2 node is a fork of Arbitrum’s geth implementation with notable changes to the state transition function. A valid state transition in Kinto disallows all contract calls by EOAs and new contract creation, unless specifically whitelisted. The current whitelist is sourced directly from the KintoAppRegistry smart contract on Kinto L2, and can be modified by its Owner without delay. This setup effectively enforces smart wallet use because the auxiliary contracts of the standard KintoWallet smart wallet (like the EntryPoint and the KintoWalletFactory) are whitelisted.

    The KYC validation is part of the KintoWallet signature verification. Since all users must use the same implementation of this smart wallet, all user transactions on Kinto check for an up-to-date KYC flag, and are dropped in case the check fails.

    • Users can be censored if a KYC provider changes the users' KYC status.

    1. User Owned KYC - Kinto documentation
    Permissions

    Ethereum

    Roles:

    Sequencer 0xe27f…6a39

    Can submit transaction batches or commitments to the SequencerInbox contract on the host chain.

    Can propose new state roots (called nodes) and challenge state roots on the host chain.

    Actors:

    Kinto SecurityCouncil 0x17Eb…3B7d
    • A Multisig with 6 / 8 threshold.
    • Can act on behalf of UpgradeExecutor.
    • Is allowed to interact with RollupProxy - Pause and unpause and set important roles and parameters in the system contracts: Can delegate Sequencer management to a BatchPosterManager address, manage data availability, DACs and the fastConfirmer role, set the Sequencer-only window, introduce an allowList to the bridge and whitelist Inboxes/Outboxes - acting via UpgradeExecutor.
    • Can upgrade the implementation of RollupProxy - acting via UpgradeExecutor.
    • Can upgrade the implementation of RollupEventInbox, UpgradeExecutor, ChallengeManager, Outbox, L1ERC20Gateway, Bridge, Inbox, L1GatewayRouter, SequencerInbox - acting via ProxyAdmin, UpgradeExecutor.
    1. Security Council members - Kinto Docs
    BridgerOwnerMultisig 0xf152…5D82
    • A Multisig with 3 / 5 threshold.
    • Can upgrade the implementation of Bridger.
    TurnkeyMultisig 0xD98B…40e1
    • A Multisig with 1 / 5 threshold.
    • Member of Kinto SecurityCouncil.
    Smart contracts
    A diagram of the smart contract architecture
    A diagram of the smart contract architecture

    Ethereum

    Central contract for the project’s configuration like its execution logic hash (wasmModuleRoot) and addresses of the other system contracts. Entry point for Proposers creating new Rollup Nodes (state commitments) and Challengers submitting fraud proofs (In the Orbit stack, these two roles are both held by the Validators).

    Contract that allows challenging state roots. Can be called through the RollupProxy by Validators or the UpgradeExecutor.

    Escrow contract for the project’s gas token (can be different from ETH). Keeps a list of allowed Inboxes and Outboxes for canonical bridge messaging. This contract stores the following tokens: ETH.

    Implementation used in:

    A sequencer (registered in this contract) can submit transaction batches or commitments here.

    • Central contract defining the access control permissions for upgrading the system contract implementations.
    • Can act on behalf of ProxyAdmin.
    • Can be used to interact with RollupProxy - Pause and unpause and set important roles and parameters in the system contracts: Can delegate Sequencer management to a BatchPosterManager address, manage data availability, DACs and the fastConfirmer role, set the Sequencer-only window, introduce an allowList to the bridge and whitelist Inboxes/Outboxes.
    • Can be used to upgrade implementation of RollupProxy.

    Implementation used in:

    Facilitates L2 to L1 contract calls: Messages initiated from L2 (for example withdrawal messages) eventually resolve in execution on L1.

    Implementation used in:

    Escrows deposited ERC-20 assets for the canonical Bridge. Upon depositing, a generic token representation will be minted at the destination. Withdrawals are initiated by the Outbox contract.

    Implementation used in:

    Facilitates sending L1 to L2 messages like depositing ETH, but does not escrow funds.

    This routing contract maps tokens to the correct escrow (gateway) to be then bridged with canonical messaging.

    Implementation used in:

    Bridger gateway that can swap assets to ‘L2 final assets’ defined by the admin before bridging them to the L2. It does not have a function to bridge via the canonical bridge and uses the external socket bridge by default. This contract can store any token.

    ValidatorUtils 0x2b0E…66aF

    This contract implements view only utilities for validators.

    Implementation used in:

    OneStepProver0 0x2C1e…3C59

    One of the modular contracts used for the last step of a fraud proof, which is simulated inside a WASM virtual machine.

    Helper contract sending configuration data over the bridge during the systems initialization.

    Implementation used in:

    OneStepProverHostIo 0x551E…93b7

    One of the modular contracts used for the last step of a fraud proof, which is simulated inside a WASM virtual machine.

    ProxyAdmin 0x74C7…00df

    Can be used to upgrade implementation of RollupEventInbox, UpgradeExecutor, ChallengeManager, Outbox, L1ERC20Gateway, Bridge, Inbox, L1GatewayRouter, SequencerInbox.

    OneStepProverMemory 0x778c…40A6

    One of the modular contracts used for the last step of a fraud proof, which is simulated inside a WASM virtual machine.

    OneStepProverMath 0xacED…d38e

    One of the modular contracts used for the last step of a fraud proof, which is simulated inside a WASM virtual machine.

    OneStepProofEntry 0xEd69…40d1

    One of the modular contracts used for the last step of a fraud proof, which is simulated inside a WASM virtual machine.

    Value Secured is calculated based on these smart contracts and tokens:

    Bridger gateway that can swap assets to ‘L2 final assets’ before bridging them to the L2.

    Contract managing Inboxes and Outboxes. It escrows ETH sent to L2.

    Can be upgraded by:

    Implementation used in:

    The current deployment carries some associated risks:

    • Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is no delay on code upgrades (CRITICAL).