Search

Search for projects by name or address

ZKsync Era logo
ZKsync Era

Badges

About

ZKsync Era is a general-purpose ZK Rollup with full EVM compatibility.



Badges

About

ZKsync Era is a general-purpose ZK Rollup with full EVM compatibility.


Total
Canonically BridgedCanonically Bridged ValueCanonical
Natively MintedNatively Minted TokensNative
Externally BridgedExternally Bridged ValueExternal

ETH & derivatives
Stablecoins
BTC & derivatives
Other
Compare with other projects
Chain stats
Transfer size
Under $100
$100-$1K
$1K-$10K
$10K-$100K
Over $100K
Transfer type distribution

Past Day UOPS
Past Day Ops count
Max. UOPS
Past day UOPS/TPS Ratio
Compare with other projects

The section shows the operating costs that L2s pay to Ethereum.



Total cost
Avg cost per L2 UOP
Avg cost per day

Compare with other projects

This section shows how much data the project publishes to its data-availability (DA) layer over time. The project currently posts data to; previously it posted toEthereumEthereum.



Data posted
Avg size per day
Avg size per L2 UOP

Compare with other projects

This section shows how "live" the project's operators are by displaying how frequently they submit transactions of the selected type. It also highlights anomalies - significant deviations from their typical schedule.

No ongoing anomalies detected

Avg. proof subs. interval
Avg. state updates interval
Past 30 days anomalies
100% normal uptime

V29 Interop Messaging Upgrade

2025 Oct 6th

A protocol upgrade introducing native interop messaging between chains connected to ZKsync Gateway.

Learn more

Proof system intervention

2025 Jul 30th

The proof systemThe infrastructure that allows projects to verify their state transitions. It is composed by onchain verifiers and offchain provers. The main two flavors are optimistic and ZK proof systems, but they can be combined in a hybrid model. In general though, if a system is able to accept state roots optimistically, even if it has a ZK component, it is considered an optimistic proof system. is manually paused due to a vulnerability, causing a partial livenessLiveness refers to the ability of a system to respond to requests and to process them in a timely manner. In the context of L2s, it refers to the ability of settling transactions, proofs and state roots to the base layer. failure.

Learn more
Sequencer failureState validationData availabilityExit windowProposer failure
Sequencer failure
Enqueue via L1

Users can submit transactions to an L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. queue, but can’t force them. The sequencers cannot selectively skip transactions but can stop processing the queue entirely. In other words, if the sequencers censor or are down, they are so for everyone.

State validation
Validity proofs (ST, SN)

STARKs and SNARKs are zero knowledge proofs that ensure state correctness. STARKs proofs are wrapped in SNARKs proofs for efficiency. SNARKs require a trusted setupGeneration of a piece of data that must then be used for some cryptographic protocol to run. Generating this data requires some secret information. The "trust" comes from the fact the secret must be destroyed after the ceremony, otherwise cryptographic properties of the protocol could be broken. Once the data is generated, and the secrets are forgotten, no further participation from the creators of the ceremony is required. There are two types of trusted setups for SNARKs: (i) trusted setup per circuit where it is generated from scratch for each circuit, (ii) trusted universal setup per proving system where it can be used for several circuits..

Data availability
Onchain (SD)

All of the data (SD = state diffs) needed for proof construction is published onchain.

Exit window
None (emergency upgrade path)
4d 3h (regular upgrade path)

Non-emergency upgrades go through a 4d 3h delay, but the central operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. can still censor withdrawal transactions by implementing a TransactionFilterer with no delay.

There is no window for users to exit in case of an unwanted upgrade since contracts are instantly upgradable.

Proposer failure
Replace proposer

Only the whitelisted proposers can publish state rootsA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development., so in the event of failure the withdrawals are frozen. There is a decentralized Governance system that can attempt changing Proposers with an upgrade.

ZKsync Era
ZKsync Era is a
Stage 0
ZK Rollup.

Learn more about Stages
Please keep in mind that these stages do not reflect project security, this is an opinionated assessment of project maturity based on subjective criteria, created with a goal of incentivizing projects to push toward better decentralization. Each team may have taken different paths to achieve this goal.

All data required for proofs is published on chain

All the data that is used to construct the system state is published on chain in the form of cheap blobsThe data that a rollup publishes to its L1/data availability (DA) layer. They consist of the L2 transactions that are rolled up, along with some metadata. Blobs are introduced as a new transaction type within Ethereum with EIP-4844, and has rollup scaling specifically in mind. Blobs persist on Ethereum’s Beacon Chain ephemerally. or calldata. This ensures that it will be available for enough time.

Learn more about the DA layer here: Ethereum logoEthereum
Node software

The nodeA software client that participates in the network. software is open-source, and its source code can be found here. The main node software does not rely on Layer 1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. (L1) to reconstruct the state, but you can use this tool for that purpose. Currently, there is no straightforward method to inject the state into the main node, but ZKsync is actively working on a solution for this.

Compression scheme

Bytecodes undergo compression before deployment on Layer 1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. (L1). You can find additional information on this process here.

Genesis state

There have been neither genesis states nor regenesis.

Data format

Details on data format can be found here.

Each update to the system state must be accompanied by a ZK proof that ensures that the new state was derived by correctly applying a series of valid user transactions to the previous state. These proofs are then verified on Ethereum by a smart contract.


Prover Architecture

ZKsync Era proof systemThe infrastructure that allows projects to verify their state transitions. It is composed by onchain verifiers and offchain provers. The main two flavors are optimistic and ZK proof systems, but they can be combined in a hybrid model. In general though, if a system is able to accept state roots optimistically, even if it has a ZK component, it is considered an optimistic proof system. Boojum can be found here and contains essential tools like the ProverAn entity that generates the cryptographic proof to convince the verifier that the statement is true. In a ZK-Rollup, the prover generates the ZK (validity) proof to submit to the verifier contract., the VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover., and other backend components. The specs of the system can be found here.

ZK Circuits

ZKsync Era circuits are built from Boojum and are designed to replicate the behavior of the EVM. The source code can be found here. The circuits are checked against tests that can be found here.

  • Funds can be lost if the proof system is implemented incorrectly.

Verification Keys Generation

SNARKShort for "succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge", a SNARK is a widely used type of zero-knowledge proof that is short and fast to verify. Different kinds of SNARKs are usually systematized by proof size, verification time, and type of setup. The most famous SNARKs are Groth16, PLONK/Marlin, Bulletproofs, and STARKs. verification keys can be generated and checked against the Ethereum verifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contract using this tool. The system requires a trusted setupGeneration of a piece of data that must then be used for some cryptographic protocol to run. Generating this data requires some secret information. The "trust" comes from the fact the secret must be destroyed after the ceremony, otherwise cryptographic properties of the protocol could be broken. Once the data is generated, and the secrets are forgotten, no further participation from the creators of the ceremony is required. There are two types of trusted setups for SNARKs: (i) trusted setup per circuit where it is generated from scratch for each circuit, (ii) trusted universal setup per proving system where it can be used for several circuits..

PROVER

Trusted Setups

Onchain verifier

Used in

ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in

Onchain verifier

Used in

ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in

Onchain verifier

Used in

ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in

Onchain verifier

Used in

ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in

Program Hashes

Name
Hash
Repository
Verification
Used in
0x0100...51e6
ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in

A diagram of the upgrades and governance
A diagram of the upgrades and governance

There are two main paths for contract upgrades in the shared ZK stack ecosystem - standard and emergency - both converging on the shared upgrade management contract ProtocolUpgradeHandler. The standard path involves a governance proposal and voting through the DAO, multiple timelock delays and finally approval by the Guardians or 4 SecurityCouncil participants. The emergency path allows for contract upgrades without any delay by the EmergencyUpgradeBoard, which acts as a 3/3 Multisig between SecurityCouncil, Guardians and the FoundationMultisig.

Standard path

On ZKsync Era

Delegates can start new proposals by reaching a threshold of 21M ZK tokens on the ZKsync Era RollupA blockchain that inherits consensus and data availability from another blockchain called L1. Rollups enable trust minimized bridges with the base layer via proof systems, either optimistic or zero-knowledge. A rollup without a bridge, or without considering the bridge, is called a sovereign rollup.’s ZkProtocolGovernor contract. This launches a 3d ‘voting delay’ after which the 7d voting period starts. During these first two periods, the proposal can be canceled by the proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block. or if it falls below the proposing threshold. A proposal is only successful if it reaches both quorum (630M ZK tokens) and simple majority. When it reaches quorum, a remaining voting period of 3d is guaranteed by a potential late quorum vote extension. In the successful case, it can be queued in the 0s timelock which forwards it via the Gateway to Ethereum as an L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.->L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. log.

On Ethereum

After the execution of the proposal-containing batch (3h delay), the proposal is now picked up by the ProtocolUpgradeHandler and enters the 3d ‘legal veto period’. This serves as a window in which a veto could be coordinated offchain, to be then enforced by non-approval of Guardians and SecurityCouncil. A threshold of 2 Guardians can extend the veto period to 7d. After this a proposal enters a waiting state of 1mo, from which it can be immediately approved (cancelling the delay) by 4 participants of the SecurityCouncil. For the unlikely case that the Security CouncilA Security Council is a sufficiently decentralized set of members that is able to upgrade a system. A properly set up Security Council consists of at least 8 members with a threshold greater than 75%. What 'sufficiently decentralized' means is fundamentally subjective and L2BEAT evaluates each case individually. A Security Council is allowed to instantly upgrade Stage 1 rollups. does not approve here, the Guardians can instead approve the proposal, or nobody. In the two latter cases, the waiting period is enforced in full. A proposal cannot be actively cancelled in the ProtocolUpgradeHandler, but will expire if not approved within the waiting period. An approved proposal now enters the pendingExecution state for a final delay of 1d and can then be executed.

Other governance tracks

There are two other tracks of Governance also starting with DAO Delegate proposals the ZKsync Era rollup: 1) Token Program Proposals that add new minters, allocations or upgrade the ZK token and 2) Governance Advisory Proposals that e.g. change the ZK Credo or other offchain Governance Procedures without onchain targets. The protocol for these two other tracks is similar to the first part of the standard path described above (albeit having different quorum and timelock values), and not passing over to the Ethereum L1. Further customizations are that the ZkFoundationMultisig can propose to the ZkTokenGovernor without a threshold and that the Guardians’ L2 alias can cancel proposals in the ZkTokenGovernor and the ZkGovOpsGovernor.

Emergency path

SecurityCouncil (6/8), Guardians (5/8) and ZkFoundationMultisig (3/6) form a de-facto 3/3 Multisig by pushing an immediate upgrade proposal through the EmergencyUpgradeBoard, which circumvents all delays and executes immediately via the ProtocolUpgradeHandler.

Upgrade Delays

The cumulative duration of the upgrade paths from the moment of a voted ‘successful’ proposal is 4d 3h or 8d 3h (depending on Guardians extending the LegalVetoPeriod) for Standard, 0 for Emergency and 1mo 4d for the path in which the SecurityCouncil is not approving the proposal.

Freezing

The SecurityCouncil can freeze (pause withdrawals and settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals.) all chains connected to the current ChainTypeManager. Either for a softFreeze of 12h or a hardFreeze of 7d. After a softFreeze and / or a hardFreeze, a proposal from the EmergencyUpgradeBoard has to be passed before subsequent freezes are possible. Only the SecurityCouncil can unfreeze an active freeze.

ZK cluster Admin and Chain Admin

Apart from the paths that can upgrade all shared implementations, the ZK stack governance system defines other roles that can modify the system: A single ZK cluster Admin role who governs parameters in the shared contracts and a Chain Admin role (defined in each chain-specific diamond contract) for managing parameters of each individual ZK chain that builds on the stack. These chain-specific actions include critical operations like setting a transaction filterer that can censor L1 -> L2 messages, changing the DA mode, migrating the chain to a different settlement layer and standard operations like setting fee parameters and adding / removing ValidatorsIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier in the ValidatorTimelock. For rollups, data availabilityThe property of a rollup's data being reachable by any node retrieving the data that were rolled up and executed to reach the proposed state. Data availability (DA), specifically decoupling it from the rollup nodes themselves, is one of the preeminent factors which allows a rollup to scale securely. A rollup is faced with a decision of what to use as a DA layer to guarantee that any node can retrieve this data--permissionlessly under any circumstance. For this reason, using Ethereum for DA currently provides the strongest security guarantees. If data is stored somewhere other than a permissionless L1, then the project is not a rollup, but rather a validium or an optimium. on Ethereum is validated by a RollupL1DAValidator contract (or a RelayedSLDAValidator on the Gateway). Each rollup can become a permanent rollup (through their Chain Admin) which disallows DA changes to non-whitelisted sources or settlement layers in the future. The source of truth for rollup-compliant DA validator contracts is the RollupDAManager contract, which is administered via the ProtocolUpgradeHandler. ZKsync Era’s Chain Admin differs from the others as it also has the above ZK cluster Admin role in the shared ZK stack contracts.

Governance profile

Security Council

Composition

4/8 to approve upgrades · 3/8 soft freeze · 6/8 hard freeze, unfreeze and emergency approval. No fixed terms: members serve until replaced via Protocol Governor proposal.

Members public

Mapped — 8 representatives of different orgs + signer addresses published in Schedule 3.

Charter

ZKsync Governance Procedures, Schedules 2–3 + bylaws of the ZKsync Security CouncilA Security Council is a sufficiently decentralized set of members that is able to upgrade a system. A properly set up Security Council consists of at least 8 members with a threshold greater than 75%. What 'sufficiently decentralized' means is fundamentally subjective and L2BEAT evaluates each case individually. A Security Council is allowed to instantly upgrade Stage 1 rollups. entity.

Can bypass DAO?

Freeze yes, upgrade no (alone) — can unilaterally and immideately freeze the protocol: 12h soft freeze (3/8) or 7d hard freeze (6/8). Upgrades require approvals from 5/8 Guardians and 3/6 ZK Foundation Multisig.

DAO can override SC?

Partially — the Token Assembly can pass a Protocol Governor proposal replacing SC members, but it needs SC approval (4/8) or 5/8 Guardians as fallback. No unconditional tokenholder path.

Guardians

Composition

5/8 for vetoes and approvals, no fixed terms. Addresses and names of individuals that take Guardian role are published in Schedule 4.

Powers

Veto + fallback approval + emergency co-sign. L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. Onchain veto (5/8) cancels Token/GovOps proposals during voting delay or vote. Offchain veto (5 signed statements to the SC Foundation) blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. Protocol proposals during the 3d legal veto period; 2/8 can extend it to 7d. 5/8 can approve a Protocol proposal in risk review if the SC won’t. The Guardian multisig is 1 of 3 emergency upgrade signers. Veto justification due on the forum within 48h.

Self-protection

Yes — Guardian membership is changed via Protocol Governor proposal, but Guardians may explicitly veto proposals affecting the Guardian body itself (Schedule 4 §5.2). Token holders have no unconditional onchain removal path.

Upgrades

Normal upgrade path

ZIP submission on L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. → 3d voting delay → 7d vote (late quorum +3d) → L2→L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. message to the ProtocolUpgradeHandler → 3d Guardian offchain-veto window (extendable to 7d by 2/8) → ≤1mo risk review, SC approval (4/8) short-circuits to → 1d timelock → permissionlessAnyone willing should be able to join and leave the network at any time, without causing significant disturbance to the network or being detrimental to the party in question. No single entity should have the power to allowlist or blocklist participants. execution on Ethereum. Fastest ≈ 14 days from submission; Guardian-fallback path ≈ 44 days.

Emergency upgrade path

6/8 SC + 5/8 Guardians + 3/6 ZKsync Foundation, instant.

Exit window

~4 days after the vote closes when the SC approves promptly (3d veto window + 1d timelock). 0 for emergency upgrades.

Token Program path

Grants or modifies capped ZK minting/burning rights. TPPs via Token Governor: 3d delay → 7d vote (late quorum +2d) → 3d timelock → permissionlessAnyone willing should be able to join and leave the network at any time, without causing significant disturbance to the network or being detrimental to the party in question. No single entity should have the power to allowlist or blocklist participants. execution on Era, ≈ 13 days.

GovOps path

GAPs via GovOps Governor: same 3d + 7d + 3d schedule, but advisory only, implementation is left to the proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block. or named parties.

Token governance

Governance token

ZK — 21.00 B maximum mintable supply, 14.96 B currently minted, 1 delegated token = 1 vote. ZK tokens need to be delegated for voting, but are not locked.

Voting venue

ZKsync Governance Portal powered by Cactus (formerly Tally). Three OpenZeppelin Governors on ZKsync Era: Protocol, Token, GovOps, each with its own timelock.

Proposal threshold

21,000,000 ZK delegated (0.1% of the 21.00 B max mintable supply), identical for all three governors.

Quorum

630,000,000 ZK (3% of max mintable supply) for all three governors. Simple majority of For vs Against; abstentions don’t count. Late-quorum extension: +3d (Protocol), +2d (Token/GovOps).

Execution model

On-chain payload · PermissionlessAnyone willing should be able to join and leave the network at any time, without causing significant disturbance to the network or being detrimental to the party in question. No single entity should have the power to allowlist or blocklist participants. execute. Protocol proposals travel via L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.→L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. message and are permissionlessly executed on Ethereum after review + timelock; Token proposals execute permissionlessly on Era after their timelock.

Past upgrades

The metrics include upgrades on the currently used proxy contracts. Historical proxy contracts and changes of such are not included.

Count of upgrades
70
Last upgrade
1mo 12d ago
Avg upgrade interval
4mo 7d
2026 August 17, 11:29 UTC
High severity
11changes

Matter Labs 4/7 multisig upgraded the boojum verifiers to version v0.30.1 (registered on the ChainTypeManager before). The new verifiers are not yet reproduced.

contract Diamond (eth:0x32400084C286CF3E17e7B677ea9583e60a000324) [shared-zk-stack/Diamond] {
+++ description: The main contract defining the Layer 2. Operator actions like commiting blocks, providing ZK proofs and executing batches ultimately target this contract which then processes transactions. During batch execution it processes L1 --> L2 and L2 --> L1 transactions. isPermanentRollup was set to true in this contract which prevents changing the DA mode to Validium in the future.
values.$pastUpgrades.28:
+ ["2026-08-16T09:36:47.000Z","0xa22268c77351fd1c1e3c632ad2323425cb1f2330b2ee34686c0a081f93bdd423",["eth:0x37CefD5b44c131FEf27e9Bc542e5B77A177A7253","eth:0x1666124221622eb6154306Ea9BA87043e8be88B2","eth:0x1e34aB39a9682149165ddeCc0583d238A5448B45","eth:0x0597CaA8A823A699d7CD9E62B5E5d4153FF82691"]]
values.$upgradeCount:
- 28
+ 29
+++ description: Protocol version, increments with each protocol upgrade.
+++ severity: HIGH
values.getProtocolVersion:
- 128849018880
+ 128849018881
values.getSemverProtocolVersion.2:
- 0
+ 1
values.getVerifier:
- "eth:0xC47D355402E78b886B628914B3b129F236fEe3cc"
+ "eth:0xCeF0218c0C6dB0768e48debeE26E41B8DAdE7081"
}
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierPlonk (eth:0x35CD3865199F2D9c574f34DD72520B19842d440c) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierPlonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the PlonK proof system.
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierFflonk (eth:0x4A34cE730052cb195d8a95e730623eEcc1CB8B66) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierFflonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof system.
- Status: DELETED
contract DualVerifier (eth:0xC47D355402E78b886B628914B3b129F236fEe3cc) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0x4A34cE730052cb195d8a95e730623eEcc1CB8B66 or eth:0x35CD3865199F2D9c574f34DD72520B19842d440c depending on the supplied proof type.
+ Status: CREATED
contract EraVerifierPlonk (eth:0x0DAAB2B7b38ab48712996E760152c569FA356DbF) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierPlonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the PlonK proof system.
+ Status: CREATED
contract EraVerifierFflonk (eth:0x8470d6B3fd71B5fE3906B4ea04498d18F721eDe9) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierFflonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof system.
+ Status: CREATED
contract EraDualVerifier (eth:0xCeF0218c0C6dB0768e48debeE26E41B8DAdE7081) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0x8470d6B3fd71B5fE3906B4ea04498d18F721eDe9 or eth:0x0DAAB2B7b38ab48712996E760152c569FA356DbF depending on the supplied proof type.
2026 August 10, 09:26 UTC
High severity
12changes

Matter Labs 4/7 multisig upgraded boojum verifier to v29.5 (was registered on chain type manager before). Verifier is not yet reproduced. Config-related: added full batch lifecycle permissions to era multisig template, fixed incorrect permissions and descriptions.

contract Diamond (eth:0x32400084C286CF3E17e7B677ea9583e60a000324) [shared-zk-stack/Diamond] {
+++ description: The main contract defining the Layer 2. Operator actions like commiting blocks, providing ZK proofs and executing batches ultimately target this contract which then processes transactions. During batch execution it processes L1 --> L2 and L2 --> L1 transactions. isPermanentRollup was set to true in this contract which prevents changing the DA mode to Validium in the future.
values.$pastUpgrades.27:
+ ["2026-08-08T17:03:47.000Z","0x1586dea0c7326b2ae060b222925e9c752481cd049f907634a114200ecaa7baab",["eth:0x37CefD5b44c131FEf27e9Bc542e5B77A177A7253","eth:0x1666124221622eb6154306Ea9BA87043e8be88B2","eth:0x1e34aB39a9682149165ddeCc0583d238A5448B45","eth:0x0597CaA8A823A699d7CD9E62B5E5d4153FF82691"]]
values.$upgradeCount:
- 27
+ 28
+++ description: Protocol version, increments with each protocol upgrade.
+++ severity: HIGH
values.getProtocolVersion:
- 124554051589
+ 128849018880
values.getSemverProtocolVersion.1:
- 29
+ 30
values.getSemverProtocolVersion.2:
- 5
+ 0
values.getVerifier:
- "eth:0x47fC5273145E053A18C0BBF6d88F8d6d573C3d0e"
+ "eth:0xC47D355402E78b886B628914B3b129F236fEe3cc"
}
- Status: DELETED
contract DualVerifier (eth:0x47fC5273145E053A18C0BBF6d88F8d6d573C3d0e) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0x9f5C39a2790f38542065E7854b90407371923375 or eth:0xd22cA89e8991FCE568456914c616d303e3142395 depending on the supplied proof type.
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierFflonk (eth:0x9f5C39a2790f38542065E7854b90407371923375) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierFflonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof system.
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierPlonk (eth:0xd22cA89e8991FCE568456914c616d303e3142395) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierPlonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the PlonK proof system.
+ Status: CREATED
contract L1VerifierPlonk (eth:0x35CD3865199F2D9c574f34DD72520B19842d440c) [N/A]
+++ description: None
+ Status: CREATED
contract L1VerifierFflonk (eth:0x4A34cE730052cb195d8a95e730623eEcc1CB8B66) [N/A]
+++ description: None
+ Status: CREATED
contract DualVerifier (eth:0xC47D355402E78b886B628914B3b129F236fEe3cc) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0x4A34cE730052cb195d8a95e730623eEcc1CB8B66 or eth:0x35CD3865199F2D9c574f34DD72520B19842d440c depending on the supplied proof type.
2026 July 27, 16:36 UTC
High severity
11changes

Upgraded boojum verifiers to the next version. It is not yet verified.

contract Diamond (eth:0x32400084C286CF3E17e7B677ea9583e60a000324) [shared-zk-stack/Diamond] {
+++ description: The main contract defining the Layer 2. Operator actions like commiting blocks, providing ZK proofs and executing batches ultimately target this contract which then processes transactions. During batch execution it processes L1 --> L2 and L2 --> L1 transactions. isPermanentRollup was set to true in this contract which prevents changing the DA mode to Validium in the future.
values.$pastUpgrades.26:
+ ["2026-07-24T17:51:11.000Z","0x3230654aa6e3c7d63a7f6d8bfe6eccabc98a11f18409af0fcadd12f8b65f34b4",["eth:0x37CefD5b44c131FEf27e9Bc542e5B77A177A7253","eth:0x1666124221622eb6154306Ea9BA87043e8be88B2","eth:0x1e34aB39a9682149165ddeCc0583d238A5448B45","eth:0x0597CaA8A823A699d7CD9E62B5E5d4153FF82691"]]
values.$upgradeCount:
- 26
+ 27
+++ description: Protocol version, increments with each protocol upgrade.
+++ severity: HIGH
values.getProtocolVersion:
- 124554051588
+ 124554051589
values.getSemverProtocolVersion.2:
- 4
+ 5
values.getVerifier:
- "eth:0xCD279BD537c8e1A1acC46aC2205bebD8902F7A45"
+ "eth:0x47fC5273145E053A18C0BBF6d88F8d6d573C3d0e"
}
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierPlonk (eth:0x7f33D100f482093182111d69a4a457289e99f4ec) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierPlonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the PlonK proof system.
- Status: DELETED
contract L1VerifierFflonk (eth:0xa38a0Df579F9eCA29fbA560b9885B1113b1Df442) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierFflonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof system.
- Status: DELETED
contract DualVerifier (eth:0xCD279BD537c8e1A1acC46aC2205bebD8902F7A45) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0xa38a0Df579F9eCA29fbA560b9885B1113b1Df442 or eth:0x7f33D100f482093182111d69a4a457289e99f4ec depending on the supplied proof type.
+ Status: CREATED
contract DualVerifier (eth:0x47fC5273145E053A18C0BBF6d88F8d6d573C3d0e) [shared-zk-stack/DualVerifier]
+++ description: A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to eth:0x9f5C39a2790f38542065E7854b90407371923375 or eth:0xd22cA89e8991FCE568456914c616d303e3142395 depending on the supplied proof type.
+ Status: CREATED
contract L1VerifierFflonk (eth:0x9f5C39a2790f38542065E7854b90407371923375) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierFflonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof system.
+ Status: CREATED
contract L1VerifierPlonk (eth:0xd22cA89e8991FCE568456914c616d303e3142395) [shared-zk-stack/L1VerifierPlonk]
+++ description: Verifies a zk-SNARK proof using an implementation of the PlonK proof system.
2026 July 23, 11:34 UTC
High severity
4changes

Rotated one validator.

contract EraMultisigValidator (eth:0xdC26B08F0335b68721F64001C38b05D0BC9B539d) [shared-zk-stack/ExecutionMultisigValidatorTimelock_Trackable] {
+++ description: A multisig wrapper around `ValidatorTimelock` that requires a threshold of approvals before batch execution can proceed, provides additional security through 2FA.
values.$members.3:
- "eth:0xd3cA2aDe062d453F410b5C5cfA1B2b89879AbE1b"
values.$members.7:
+ "eth:0x2400D5d69043d9BE4fF32c6F8F28047d605ad976"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.3:
- "eth:0xd3cA2aDe062d453F410b5C5cfA1B2b89879AbE1b"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.7:
+ "eth:0x2400D5d69043d9BE4fF32c6F8F28047d605ad976"
}
2026 July 08, 09:08 UTC
High severity
8changes

Rotated 4 validator multisig members.

contract EraMultisigValidator (eth:0xdC26B08F0335b68721F64001C38b05D0BC9B539d) [shared-zk-stack/ExecutionMultisigValidatorTimelock_Trackable] {
+++ description: A multisig wrapper around `ValidatorTimelock` that requires a threshold of approvals before batch execution can proceed, provides additional security through 2FA.
values.$members.2:
- "eth:0x8ffC957cba878cDdF446574e88Cf7e1004fc953F"
values.$members.3:
- "eth:0x548409daf1D6766929F3927D1Ca1df0A13129a6b"
values.$members.6:
+ "eth:0xf6f32866b8De74683563fCCd07dE7e23431d0626"
values.$members.7:
+ "eth:0x809bc2e1519641B482730330922950a4972a2227"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.2:
- "eth:0x8ffC957cba878cDdF446574e88Cf7e1004fc953F"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.3:
- "eth:0x548409daf1D6766929F3927D1Ca1df0A13129a6b"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.6:
+ "eth:0xf6f32866b8De74683563fCCd07dE7e23431d0626"
+++ severity: HIGH
values.multisigMembers.7:
+ "eth:0x809bc2e1519641B482730330922950a4972a2227"
}

The system has a centralized operator

The operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. is the only entity that can propose blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over.. A live and trustworthy operator is vital to the health of the system.

Batch execution is initiated by permissioned executor EOAs, but each batch also requires approval from the sufficient number of EraMultisigValidator members before it can be executed on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development..

  • MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.

  • Users can be censored if the validator multisig does not approve batch execution.

  1. EraMultisigValidator - Etherscan proxy contract

Users can force any transaction via L1

If a user is censored by the L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. SequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs., they can try to force their transaction via an L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. queue. Right now there is no mechanism that forces L2 Sequencer to include transactions from the queue in an L2 blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over.. The operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. can implement a TransactionFilterer that censors forced transactions.

  • Users can be censored if the operator refuses to include their transactions.

  • Users can be censored if the operator implements a TransactionFilterer, which is possible without delay.

  1. L1 - L2 interoperability - Developer's documentation

Regular messaging

The user initiates L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.->L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. messages by submitting a regular transaction on this chain. When the blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. containing that transaction is settled, the message becomes available for processing on L1. ZK proofs are required to settle blocks.

  1. Withdrawing funds - ZKsync documentation

Forced messaging

If the user experiences censorship from the operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. with regular L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.->L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. messaging they can submit their messages directly on L1. The system is then obliged to service this request or halt all messages from L1, including all forced withdrawals and deposits. Once the force operation is submitted and if the request is serviced, the operation follows the flow of a regular message.

A dashboard to explore contracts and permissions
Go to Disco
Disco UI Banner

Ethereum

Actors:

EmergencyUpgradeBoard0xF73a…a111

A custom contract allowing a 3/3 of SecurityCouncil, ZK Foundation Multisig and Guardians to executeEmergencyUpgrade() via the ProtocolUpgradeHandler.

  • Can upgrade with no delay
    • ValidatorTimelock
    • BridgeHub
    • L1ERC20Bridge
    • MessageRoot
    • CTMDeploymentTracker
    • L1AssetRouter
    • L1NativeTokenVault
    • ChainTypeManager
    • L1Nullifier
    • ChainAssetHandler
    • ProtocolUpgradeHandler
  • Can interact with BridgeHub
    • set critical contract addresses for the shared cluster, register settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals. layers, pause and unpause migrations and the bridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. and manage zk chain registration
  • Can interact with L1NativeTokenVault
    • pause / unpause the bridge
  • Can interact with ChainTypeManager
    • manage the shared ValidatorTimelock contract address and the admin role, register and execute upgrades (and set their deadlines), freeze, revert batches and set permissioned validatorsIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier and fee params for all connected chains
  • Can interact with L1Nullifier
    • pause, unpause and set critical escrow address references
  • Can interact with ChainAssetHandler
    • pause, resume chain migrations
  • Can interact with RollupDAManager
    • manage allowed rollupA blockchain that inherits consensus and data availability from another blockchain called L1. Rollups enable trust minimized bridges with the base layer via proof systems, either optimistic or zero-knowledge. A rollup without a bridge, or without considering the bridge, is called a sovereign rollup. DA pairs (allowed to be used by rollups in permanent rollup mode)
Used in:
Matter Labs Multisig0x4e49…7828

A Multisig with 4/7 threshold.

  • Can upgrade with no delay
    • EraMultisigValidator
    • ServerNotifier
  • Can interact with BridgeHub
    • create new zk chains (based on the current version), register tokens (ZK cluster Admin role)
  • Can interact with Diamond
    • administrate operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. roles for this chain in the ValidatorTimelock, manage fees, apply predefined upgrades, manage censorship through a TransactionFilterer, set DA mode, migrate the chain to whitelisted settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals. layers (Chain Admin role)
  • Can interact with ChainTypeManager
    • set the pending admin of this contract and the ServerNotifier contract address (ZK cluster Admin role)
  • Can interact with EraMultisigValidator
    • change the members and threshold of the ValidatorIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier Multisig and set the delay between batch commitment and execution
Used in:
SecurityCouncil0x5919…9035

A Multisig with 6/8 threshold. Custom Multisig implementation that has a general threshold of 6 but also specific thresholds for upgrade approvals (4) or soft freezes (3).

  • Can interact with ProtocolUpgradeHandler
    • soft freeze, hard freeze, approve a protocol upgrade
  • Can interact with EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • one of its 3/3 signers
Used in:
  1. Security Council members - ZK Nation docs
Guardians0x600d…86b8

A Multisig with 5/8 threshold. Custom Multisig implementation that has a general threshold of 5 and a specific threshold for extending the legal voting period of 2.

  • Can interact with ProtocolUpgradeHandler
    • extend the legal veto period, approve a protocol upgrade
  • Can interact with EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • one of its 3/3 signers
Used in:
  1. Guardians - ZK Nation docs
ValidatorTimelock0x2e51…b776

Intermediary contract between the ValidatorsIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier and the central diamond contract that delays blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. execution (ie withdrawals and other L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. --> L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. messages) by 3h.

  • Can interact with Diamond
    • commit, prove, execute, revert batches directly in the main Diamond contract. This role is typically held by a proxying ValidatorTimelock
Used in:
EraMultisigValidator0xdC26…539d

A Multisig with 3/8 threshold. A multisig wrapper around ValidatorTimelock that requires a threshold of approvals before batch execution can proceed, provides additional security through 2FA.

  • Can interact with ValidatorTimelock
    • Permissioned to call the functions to commit, prove, execute and revert L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. batches through the ValidatorTimelock in the main Diamond contract
ZK Foundation Multisig0xbC16…B51c

A Multisig with 3/6 threshold.

  • Can interact with EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • one of its 3/3 signers
Used in:
  • Can interact with EraMultisigValidator
    • execute predefined protocol upgrades (diamond cuts registered in the ChainTypeManager) for the chain through this contract
    • initiate batch execution on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. if approved by enough ValidatorIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier Multisig members
    • revert unexecuted batches through this contract
    • submit batch precommitments on L1 through this contract
    • submit batch proofs on L1 through this contract
    • submit batches on L1 through this contract (no Validator Multisig approvals required)

ZKsync Era

Actors:

ZkProtocolGovernor0x7670…e34f

Main Governance contract allowing for token voting (simple majority) with the ZK token through delegates. This contract is used for protocol upgrade proposals (ZIPs) that start on ZKsync Era, go through Ethereum Layer 1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. and can - from there - target all L1 and L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. contracts. At least 21M ZK tokens are necessary to start a proposal and a 630M quorum of voted tokens must be met to succeed.

  • Can interact with ProtocolUpgradeHandler
    • start (queue) upgrades
  • Can interact with ProtocolTimelockController
    • cancel queued transactions
    • execute transactions that are ready
    • manage all access control roles and change the minimum delay
    • propose transactions
Used in:
ZkTokenGovernor0xb83F…5746

Governance contract allowing for token voting (simple majority) with the ZK token through delegates. This contract is used for Token Program Proposals (TPPs) usually targeting the ZK token on ZKsync Era. At least 21M ZK tokens are necessary to start a proposal (for delegates) and a 630M quorum of voted tokens must be met to succeed.

  • Can interact with ZkToken
    • grant the MINTER_ROLE to arbitrary addresses, thus controlling the minting of the ZK token with 3d delay
  • Can interact with ZkTokenTimelockController
    • manage all access control roles and change the minimum delay with 6d delay
    • cancel queued transactions
    • execute transactions that are ready
    • propose transactions
Used in:
Guardians_l2Alias0x711e…97c9
  • Can interact with ZkTokenGovernor
    • cancel proposals while they are pending (after having been proposed) or active (during the voting period)
Used in:
ZKFoundationMultisig_l2Alias0xcd27…C62D
  • Can interact with ZkTokenGovernor
    • make direct proposals without owning ZK tokens. In propose-guarded mode, this address is the ONLY allowed proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block.. Propose-guarded mode is currently set to false
Used in:
ProtocolUpgradeHandler_l2Alias0xF41E…6bc4
  • Can upgrade with no delay
    • ZkToken
  • Can interact with ZkToken
    • control all roles in the ZkToken access control, including the minter roles
Used in:
A dashboard to explore contracts and permissions
Go to Disco
Disco UI Banner
A diagram of the smart contract architecture
A diagram of the smart contract architecture

Ethereum

The main contract defining the Layer 2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.. OperatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. actions like commiting blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over., providing ZK proofs and executing batches ultimately target this contract which then processes transactions. During batch execution it processes L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. --> L2 and L2 --> L1 transactions. isPermanentRollup was set to true in this contract which prevents changing the DA mode to ValidiumAn off-chain solution that uses validity proofs for settlement and publishes the data offchain, therefore requiring an additional trust assumption. in the future.

  • Roles:
    • getAdmin: EraChainAdminProxy; ultimately Matter Labs Multisig
    • validatorsIn the context of L2s, a Validator is an actor that validates the correctness of state transitions. For optimistic rollups this corresponds to challengers, and for ZK rollups this corresponds to the onchain verifier: ValidatorTimelock
Implementation used in:

The main registry (hub) for all the contracts in the ZK stack cluster and central entrypoint for bridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. transactions. Stores important mappings like from chainId to diamond address, from chainId to parent CTM, from chainId to base token etc. A clone of Bridgehub is also deployed on each L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. chain, but this clone is only used on settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals. layers.

  • Roles:
    • admin: EraChainAdminProxy, ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard, Matter Labs Multisig
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:

Aggregates remote bridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. message roots from all ZK stack chains. To be used with the Gateway when deployed.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:

Asset deployment tracker where the ‘asset’ is a ChainTypeManager. The registering of asset IDs for ChainTypeManagers is necessary to be able to migrate them to a given settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals. layer, for example the Gateway.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:
RollupL1DAValidator0x7221…9119

Contract that verifies the data availabilityThe property of a rollup's data being reachable by any node retrieving the data that were rolled up and executed to reach the proposed state. Data availability (DA), specifically decoupling it from the rollup nodes themselves, is one of the preeminent factors which allows a rollup to scale securely. A rollup is faced with a decision of what to use as a DA layer to guarantee that any node can retrieve this data--permissionlessly under any circumstance. For this reason, using Ethereum for DA currently provides the strongest security guarantees. If data is stored somewhere other than a permissionless L1, then the project is not a rollup, but rather a validium or an optimium. of ethereum calldata and blobsThe data that a rollup publishes to its L1/data availability (DA) layer. They consist of the L2 transactions that are rolled up, along with some metadata. Blobs are introduced as a new transaction type within Ethereum with EIP-4844, and has rollup scaling specifically in mind. Blobs persist on Ethereum’s Beacon Chain ephemerally.. Can be used by ZK stack rollups as the L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. part of a DAValidator pair.

Implementation used in:

Canonical central asset router for all ZK stack chains. Routes deposits and withdrawals to the respective asset handlers (like the L1NativeTokenVault); does not escrow funds itself.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:
Used in:

Defines L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. diamond contract versions, creation and upgrade data and the proof systemThe infrastructure that allows projects to verify their state transitions. It is composed by onchain verifiers and offchain provers. The main two flavors are optimistic and ZK proof systems, but they can be combined in a hybrid model. In general though, if a system is able to accept state roots optimistically, even if it has a ZK component, it is considered an optimistic proof system. for all ZK stack chains connected to it. ZK chains are children of this central contract and can only upgrade to versions that were previously registered here. The current protocol version is 0,30,1.

  • Roles:
    • admin: EraChainAdminProxy, ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard, Matter Labs Multisig
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:

Contract responsible for bookkeeping L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. bridging transactions. Used to finalize withdrawals and reclaim failed deposits. Does not escrow funds.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:
Used in:

The central upgrade contract and Governance proxy for all ZK stack contracts. Accepts successful DAO proposals from L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups. and emergency proposals from the EmergencyUpgradeBoard. The three members of the EmergencyUpgradeBoard also have special roles and permissions in this contract.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • emergencyUpgradeBoard: EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • guardians: Guardians
    • l2_protocol_governor: ProtocolTimelockController; ultimately ZkProtocolGovernor
    • securityCouncil: SecurityCouncil
Proxy used in:
RollupDAManager0xE689…3C45

Simple registry for allowed DA address pairs for the ‘rollupA blockchain that inherits consensus and data availability from another blockchain called L1. Rollups enable trust minimized bridges with the base layer via proof systems, either optimistic or zero-knowledge. A rollup without a bridge, or without considering the bridge, is called a sovereign rollup.’ data availabilityThe property of a rollup's data being reachable by any node retrieving the data that were rolled up and executed to reach the proposed state. Data availability (DA), specifically decoupling it from the rollup nodes themselves, is one of the preeminent factors which allows a rollup to scale securely. A rollup is faced with a decision of what to use as a DA layer to guarantee that any node can retrieve this data--permissionlessly under any circumstance. For this reason, using Ethereum for DA currently provides the strongest security guarantees. If data is stored somewhere other than a permissionless L1, then the project is not a rollup, but rather a validium or an optimium. mode (can be permanently enforced with isPermanentRollup=true). Rollup DA address pairs (especially the L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. part) usually point to contracts that validate if data was made available on Ethereum.

  • Roles:
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Implementation used in:
EraChainAdminProxy0x2cf3…5063

A governance proxy that lets Matter Labs Multisig act through it.

  • Roles:
    • owner: Matter Labs Multisig
Implementation used in:

Legacy bridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. for depositing ERC20 tokens to ZKsync Era. Forwards deposits and withdrawals to the BridgeHub.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard

All supported tokens in this escrow are included in the value secured calculation.

BridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. for depositing wrapped stETH (Lido) to ZKsync Era. These deposits and withdrawals do not go through the shared Bridge.

The following tokens are included in the value secured calculation:
wstETH token logo
ProxyAdmin0x0D8d…9BBB
  • Roles:
    • owner: Matter Labs Multisig
EraVerifierPlonk0x0DAA…6DbF

Verifies a zk-SNARKShort for "succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge", a SNARK is a widely used type of zero-knowledge proof that is short and fast to verify. Different kinds of SNARKs are usually systematized by proof size, verification time, and type of setup. The most famous SNARKs are Groth16, PLONK/Marlin, Bulletproofs, and STARKs. proof using an implementation of the PlonKA zk-SNARK proving system introduced by Gabizon, Williamson and Ciobotaru in 2019 that allows proving custom circuits. Plonk is based on KZG polynomial commitments and thus requires a universal trusted setup. proof systemThe infrastructure that allows projects to verify their state transitions. It is composed by onchain verifiers and offchain provers. The main two flavors are optimistic and ZK proof systems, but they can be combined in a hybrid model. In general though, if a system is able to accept state roots optimistically, even if it has a ZK component, it is considered an optimistic proof system..

Implementation used in:
EraVerifierFflonk0x8470…eDe9

Verifies a zk-SNARKShort for "succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge", a SNARK is a widely used type of zero-knowledge proof that is short and fast to verify. Different kinds of SNARKs are usually systematized by proof size, verification time, and type of setup. The most famous SNARKs are Groth16, PLONK/Marlin, Bulletproofs, and STARKs. proof using an implementation of the fflonk proof systemThe infrastructure that allows projects to verify their state transitions. It is composed by onchain verifiers and offchain provers. The main two flavors are optimistic and ZK proof systems, but they can be combined in a hybrid model. In general though, if a system is able to accept state roots optimistically, even if it has a ZK component, it is considered an optimistic proof system..

Implementation used in:
EraDualVerifier0xCeF0…7081

A router contract for verifiers. Routes verification requests to EraVerifierFflonk or EraVerifierPlonk depending on the supplied proof type.

Implementation used in:
ProxyAdmin
2 instances
0x1e4c…bE3e0xC2a3…2cf1
  • Roles:
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler
Implementation used in:
ProxyAdmin0x257F…D29B
  • Roles:
    • owner: EraChainAdminProxy
Implementation used in:

Canonical central asset escrow for all ZK stack chains.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard

All supported tokens in this escrow are included in the value secured calculation.

Proxy used in:

Specialized contract for managing chain assets, i.e. chain migrations.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler; ultimately EmergencyUpgradeBoard
Proxy used in:

A simple contract that can be called by the ChainAdmin to emit notifications about chain migrations.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ProxyAdmin; ultimately Matter Labs Multisig
Proxy used in:

ZKsync Era

ProtocolTimelockController0x085b…c714

Timelock contract allowing the queueing of transactions with a minimum delay of 0s.

  • Roles:
    • canceller: ZkProtocolGovernor
    • executor: ZkProtocolGovernor
    • proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block.: ZkProtocolGovernor
    • timelockAdmin: ProtocolTimelockController; ultimately ZkProtocolGovernor
Implementation used in:

The ZK token contract on ZKsync Era. Mintable through access control roles. Used for voting in the ZK stack governance system.

  • Roles:
    • admin: ZkTokenProxyAdmin; ultimately ProtocolUpgradeHandler_l2Alias
    • defaultAdmin: ProtocolUpgradeHandler_l2Alias
    • minterAdmin: ZkTokenTimelockController; ultimately ZkTokenGovernor
Proxy used in:
ZkTokenProxyAdmin0xdB1E…15CC
  • Roles:
    • owner: ProtocolUpgradeHandler_l2Alias
Implementation used in:
ZkTokenTimelockController0xe5d2…9c3d

Timelock contract allowing the queueing of transactions with a minimum delay of 3d.

  • Roles:
    • canceller: ZkTokenGovernor
    • executor: ZkTokenGovernor
    • proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block.: ZkTokenGovernor
    • timelockAdmin: ZkTokenTimelockController; ultimately ZkTokenGovernor
Implementation used in:

The current deployment carries some associated risks:

  • Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is a 4d 3h - 8d 3h delay on code upgrades unless upgrade is initiated by the EmergencyUpgradeBoard in which case there is no delay.

Program Hashes

Name
Hash
Repository
Verification
Used in
0x0100...51e6
ZKsync Era logoAbstract logoCronos zkEVM logoSophon logoLens logo

Projects used in

Search for projects used in