Search for projects by name or address
RISE is a low-latency Optimium built on the OP Stack, using the OP Succinct Lite ZK fault proof system and posting data to EigenDA. It targets real-time trading applications through its RISEx exchange.
RISE is a low-latency Optimium built on the OP Stack, using the OP Succinct Lite ZK fault proof system and posting data to EigenDA. It targets real-time trading applications through its RISEx exchange.
Consequence: projects without a sufficiently decentralized set of challengers rely on few entities to safely update the state. A small set of challengers can collude with the proposer to finalize an invalid state, which can cause loss of funds.
Learn more about the recategorisation here.
The section shows the operating costs that L2s pay to Ethereum.
This section shows how much data the project publishes to its data-availability (DA) layer over time. The project currently posts data to
EigenDA.
This section shows how "live" the project's operators are by displaying how frequently they submit transactions of the selected type. It also highlights anomalies - significant deviations from their typical schedule.
All liveness anomalies detected for this project in the last 30 days, helping you review recent downtime and availability issues.
No State updates were performed for 2h 17m (from 2026 Sep 11, 08:04 UTC until 2026 Sep 11, 10:21 UTC). These typically occur every 35m 5s on average.
RISE public mainnet launch
2026 May 1st
RISE opens its mainnet (genesis on January 5th 2026) to the public together with the RISEx exchange.
In the event of a sequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs. failure, users can force transactions to be included in the project’s chain by sending them to L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development.. There can be up to a 12h delay on this operation.
Fraud proofs allow actors watching the chain to prove that the state is incorrect. Single round proofs (1R) only require a single transaction to resolve. ZK proofs are used to prove the correctness of the state transition. The system currently operates with a closed set of 1 whitelisted challenger.
Proof construction and state derivation fully rely on data that is posted on EigenDA. The sequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs. is publishing data to EigenDA v2. Sequencer transaction data roots are checked against the DACert VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. data roots, signed off by EigenDA operators.
There is no window for users to exit in case of an unwanted upgrade since contracts are instantly upgradable.
Only the whitelisted proposers can publish state rootsA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development., so in the event of failure the withdrawals are frozen.
Transactions roots are posted onchain and the full data is posted on EigenDA. The sequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs. is publishing data to EigenDA v2. The DACert VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. is used to verify attestations from the EigenDA operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. set that the data is indeed available. If EigenDA becomes unavailable, the sequencer falls back to Ethereum.
Funds can be lost if the sequencer posts an unavailable transaction root (CRITICAL).
Funds can be lost if the data is not available on the external provider (CRITICAL).
State rootsA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. are proposed by whitelisted proposers who create dispute games via the DisputeGameFactory by posting a bond of 0.0 ETH. Once created, the game enters a challenge periodIn optimistic rollups, the window of time wherein network participants can assert that some fraud was included in a prior block. Most optimistic rollups currently specify a challenge window of 7 days. By extending the period, there is more time for participants to guard against fraud (invalid state transitions), but also more time until withdrawals gets enabled. of 1d during which whitelisted challengers can dispute the proposal by posting a bond of 0.00000025 ETH. If challenged, anyone can submit a ZK proof to prove the correct state within the proving period of 7d. After the challenge period passes without a successful challenge, or after a valid proof is submitted, anyone can resolve the game and finalize the state root.
Funds can be stolen if the validity proof cryptography is broken or implemented incorrectly.
Funds can be stolen if no whitelisted challenger disputes an invalid state root before the challenge window expires (CRITICAL).
Funds can be stolen if the proposer routes proof verification through a malicious or faulty verifier.
Funds can be frozen if the permissioned proposer fails to publish state roots to the L1.
Onchain verifier
Onchain verifier |
The metrics include upgrades on the currently used proxy contracts. Historical proxy contracts and changes of such are not included.
SystemConfig: batcherHash rotated ( 0x499a…8A41 → 0x0aE4…67d ); new batch submitter key.
SystemConfig: batcherHash rotated (0x499a…8A41 → 0x0aE4…67d); new batch submitter key.
| contract SystemConfig (eth:0xD3CAf2A473dBB5bc2E8FB7F328e01AB9B726a24f) [opstack/SystemConfig] { | |
| +++ description: Contains configuration parameters such as the Sequencer address, gas limit on this chain and the unsafe block signer address. | |
| values.batcherHash: | |
| - | "eth:0x499a15427F46685A362Dab7886A491FEfDf68A41" |
| + | "eth:0x0aE4b35f7F5efeB4c651684e1BCa12993dcBb67d" |
| } | |
Discovery rerun on the same block number with only config-related changes.
Discovery rerun on the same block number with only config-related changes.
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract L1ERC721Bridge (eth:0x01A6274B9607ac024e8c191E491d0b25ad14c217) [opstack/L1ERC721Bridge] | |
| +++ description: Used to bridge ERC-721 tokens from host chain to this chain. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract Rise Guardian Multisig (eth:0x03B85FAa108C10F6EFfec1d91954DE99dA32FB46) [GnosisSafe] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SP1Verifier (eth:0x0459d576A6223fEeA177Fb3DF53C9c77BF84C459) [succinct/SP1Verifier] | |
| +++ description: Verifier contract for SP1 proofs (v5.0.0). | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract PreimageOracle (eth:0x1fb8cdFc6831fc866Ed9C51aF8817Da5c287aDD3) [opstack/PreimageOracle] | |
| +++ description: The PreimageOracle contract is used to load the required data from L1 for a dispute game. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract PermissionedDisputeGame (eth:0x2e7758aAD2B6D3D1Fd2C937D9B322378fC644633) [opstack/PermissionedDisputeGame] | |
| +++ description: Same as FaultDisputeGame, but only two permissioned addresses are designated as proposer and challenger. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SP1VerifierGateway (eth:0x3B6041173B80E77f038f3F2C0f9744f04837185e) [succinct/SP1VerifierGateway] | |
| +++ description: This contract is the router for zk proof verification. It stores the mapping between identifiers and the address of onchain verifier contracts, routing each identifier to the corresponding verifier contract. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ProxyAdmin (eth:0x4ebc046b1cfc12659A19E124b0ea8a382777E542) [global/ProxyAdmin] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract AnchorStateRegistry (eth:0x551A672d703966D83C3EC3ea0e844f43c3373c91) [opstack/AnchorStateRegistry_post13_opsuccinct] | |
| +++ description: Contains the latest confirmed state root that can be used as a starting point in a dispute game. It specifies which game type can be used for withdrawals, which currently is the OPSuccinctFaultDisputeGame. Variant for chains using OPSuccinct (SP1) games instead of Cannon, which omits Cannon-specific cross-contract fields (vm, oracle, weth, challengePeriod, absolutePrestate from game). | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract L1StandardBridge (eth:0x553257678Dd11a6668a92934AAB005e420c6535A) [opstack/L1StandardBridge] | |
| +++ description: The main entry point to deposit ERC20 tokens from host chain to this chain. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract MIPS (eth:0x6463dEE3828677F6270d83d45408044fc5eDB908) [opstack/MIPS] | |
| +++ description: The MIPS contract is used to execute the final step of the dispute game which objectively determines the winner of the dispute. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract DisputeGameFactory (eth:0x6A4139810986CF13408330e14C4ac9Daf0511aA3) [opstack/DisputeGameFactory] | |
| +++ description: The dispute game factory allows the creation of dispute games, used to propose state roots and eventually challenge them. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SP1Verifier (eth:0x8a0fd5e825D14368d90Fe68F31fceAe3E17AFc5C) [succinct/SP1Verifier] | |
| +++ description: Verifier contract for SP1 proofs (v6.0.0). | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract Rise ProxyAdminOwner Multisig (eth:0x9196464e3F828A50233C20732fa6898F4317002c) [GnosisSafe] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract OptimismPortal2 (eth:0xad92Fa18EB74E46Db844240623124BF46589db4C) [opstack/OptimismPortal2] | |
| +++ description: The OptimismPortal contract is the main entry point to deposit funds from L1 to L2. It also allows to prove and finalize withdrawals. It specifies which game type can be used for withdrawals, which currently is the 42. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SuperchainConfig (eth:0xB786207A1EdfC724c1d507335f403F53fd9E79d6) [opstack/SuperchainConfigFake_expiry] | |
| +++ description: This is NOT the shared SuperchainConfig contract of the OP stack Superchain but rather a local fork. It manages pause states for each chain connected to it, as well as a global pause state for all chains. The guardian role can pause either separately, but each pause expires after 3mo 1d if left untouched. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract OPSuccinctFaultDisputeGame (eth:0xBf60dBc272833cD25f0426983c3175C32C8E5A7a) [succinct/OPSuccinct/OPSuccinctFaultDisputeGame] | |
| +++ description: Logic of the dispute game. When a state root is proposed, a dispute game contract is deployed. Challengers can use such contracts to challenge the proposed state root. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract L1CrossDomainMessenger (eth:0xC0de1d9B1cD2Caf782355C66a6A8e5948e63c9c6) [opstack/L1CrossDomainMessenger] | |
| +++ description: Sends messages from host chain to this chain, and relays messages back onto host chain. In the event that a message sent from host chain to this chain is rejected for exceeding this chain's epoch gas limit, it can be resubmitted via this contract's replay function. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SP1Verifier (eth:0xc3c6dDDAc8829b233Dc6536Ec024775a57b0AF2A) [shared-sp1/SP1Verifier] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SP1VerifierGatewayMultisig (eth:0xCafEf00d348Adbd57c37d1B77e0619C6244C6878) [GnosisSafe] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract ProxyAdmin (eth:0xCf32d8c4Be30cA330c1150916A71A651bADd70d5) [global/ProxyAdmin] | |
| +++ description: None | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract SystemConfig (eth:0xD3CAf2A473dBB5bc2E8FB7F328e01AB9B726a24f) [opstack/SystemConfig] | |
| +++ description: Contains configuration parameters such as the Sequencer address, gas limit on this chain and the unsafe block signer address. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract AddressManager (eth:0xdE3a0F0122f702e018e04C6D0824B724E8Be8e16) [opstack/AddressManager] | |
| +++ description: Legacy contract used to manage a mapping of string names to addresses. Modern OP stack uses a different standard proxy system instead, but this contract is still necessary for backwards compatibility with several older contracts. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract OptimismMintableERC20Factory (eth:0xE2B9526277DcD2B27222Df760D6427213AC9dbb8) [opstack/OptimismMintableERC20Factory] | |
| +++ description: A helper contract that generates OptimismMintableERC20 contracts on the network it's deployed to. OptimismMintableERC20 is a standard extension of the base ERC20 token contract designed to allow the L1StandardBridge contracts to mint and burn tokens. This makes it possible to use an OptimismMintableERC20 as this chain's representation of a token on the host chain, or vice-versa. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract DelayedWETH (eth:0xf758C3bf7a4E2ad513B371B40c4Bd9A0E9716CF1) [opstack/DelayedWETH] | |
| +++ description: Contract designed to hold the bonded ETH for each game. It is designed as a wrapper around WETH to allow an owner to function as a backstop if a game would incorrectly distribute funds. | |
| + | Status: CREATED |
| contract AccessManager (eth:0xF90a72FC295DBEf2fD27629Fda4B98Fd3E842d17) [succinct/OPSuccinct/AccessManager] | |
| +++ description: Contract managing access control for proposers and challengers in OPSuccinct. | |
The operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. is the only entity that can propose blocksAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over.. A live and trustworthy operator is vital to the health of the system.
MEV can be extracted if the operator exploits their centralized position and frontruns user transactions.
Because the state of the system is based on transactions submitted on the underlying host chain and anyone can submit their transactions there it allows the users to circumvent censorship by interacting with the smart contract on the host chain directly.
The user initiates the withdrawal by submitting a regular transaction on this chain. When a state rootA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. containing such transaction is settled, the funds become available for withdrawal on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. after 3d 12h. Withdrawal inclusion can be proven before state root settlementThe mechanism with which the execution of rollup blocks and the resultant state is verified and possible disputes are resolved. In the context of rollups or other modular blockchains, it often refers to the proof system used--validity (ZK) or fraud proofs, or a combination thereof. Sometimes it will refer to this mechanism along with where the mechanism's outputs are ultimately published and verified, as in Ethereum being a settlement layer by verifying the proofs and allowing for withdrawals., but a 7d period has to pass before it becomes actionable. The process of state root settlement takes a challenge periodIn optimistic rollups, the window of time wherein network participants can assert that some fraud was included in a prior block. Most optimistic rollups currently specify a challenge window of 7 days. By extending the period, there is more time for participants to guard against fraud (invalid state transitions), but also more time until withdrawals gets enabled. of at least 1d to complete. Finally the user submits an L1 transaction to claim the funds. This transaction requires a merkle proof.
If the user experiences censorship from the operatorAn operator is the entity charged with managing a rollup and progressing its state. A rollup operator can be a centralized sequencer, proposer, prover, challenger, pauser of admin that is able to perform upgrades. with regular L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.->L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. messaging they can submit their messages directly on L1. The system is then obliged to service this request or halt all messages, including forced withdrawals from L1 and regular messages initiated on L2. Once the force operation is submitted and if the request is serviced, the operation follows the flow of a regular message.
OP stack chains are pursuing the EVM EquivalenceA perfect degree of compatibility; where one system or concept is indistinguishable from another in the domain being compared. In the context of rollups, it generally refers to the proximity to the EVM and to Ethereum architecture. model. No changes to smart contracts are required regardless of the language they are written in, i.e. anything deployed on L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. can be deployed on L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups..

A Multisig with 3/5 threshold.
A Multisig with 3/5 threshold.
A Multisig with 2/3 threshold.

The dispute game factory allows the creation of dispute games, used to propose state rootsA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. and eventually challenge them.
The OptimismPortal contract is the main entry point to deposit funds from L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. to L2Layer 2 (L2) is a category of technical solutions aimed to scale the base layer in a trust minimized way. This category includes solutions like rollups as well as state channels and plasma. Other solutions are able to scale further, but with the introduction of additional trust assumptions, which are therefore not trust minimized. Sometimes the term Layer 2 is used to refer to include these solutions too, like validiums and optimiums, but to distinguish between trust minimized and non trust minimized solutions they are often referred to as "light" L2s, opposed to "strong" L2s like rollups.. It also allows to prove and finalize withdrawals. It specifies which game type can be used for withdrawals, which currently is the 42.

Contains configuration parameters such as the SequencerA party responsible for ordering and executing transactions on the rollup. The sequencer verifies transactions, compresses the data into a block, and submits the data related to it to enable state reconstruction to Ethereum L1 as a single transaction. The data can be either transaction data or state diffs. address, gas limitThe maximum amount of gas a transaction or block may consume. on this chain and the unsafe blockAn ordered list of transactions and chain-related metadata that gets bundled together and published to the L1/DA layer. Nodes execute the transactions contained within blocks to change the rollup chain’s state. Protocol rules dictate what constitutes a valid block, and invalid blocks are skipped over. signer address.
This is NOT the shared SuperchainConfig contract of the OP stack Superchain but rather a local fork. It manages pause states for each chain connected to it, as well as a global pause state for all chains. The guardian role can pause either separately, but each pause expires after 3mo 1d if left untouched.
Used to bridgeA message-passing protocol between two blockchains. At its most basic, a token bridge consists of a smart contract which can escrow funds on one side of the bridge, and instruct the release or minting of corresponding assets on the other side, but bridges could also support arbitrary messages. How these instructions are validated is a critical factor in assessing the trust assumptions of a bridge. ERC-721 tokens from host chain to this chain.
The main entry point to deposit ERC20 tokens from host chain to this chain.
All supported tokens in this escrow are included in the value secured calculation.
Sends messages from host chain to this chain, and relays messages back onto host chain. In the event that a message sent from host chain to this chain is rejected for exceeding this chain’s epoch gas limitThe maximum amount of gas a transaction or block may consume., it can be resubmitted via this contract’s replay function.
The PreimageOracle contract is used to load the required data from L1Layer 1 (L1) is a blockchain that is self-reliant on its validator set for its security and consensus properties. Ethereum is an example of a layer 1. Blockchains started receiving the moniker of layer 1 once layer 2 became a meaningful area of development. for a dispute game.
Same as FaultDisputeGame, but only two permissioned addresses are designated as proposerIn the context of L2s, the actor that proposes a claimed state root on L1. The term is also used in the context of Ethereum to refer to the actor that proposes a new block. and challenger.
Contains the latest confirmed state rootA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. that can be used as a starting point in a dispute game. It specifies which game type can be used for withdrawals, which currently is the OPSuccinctFaultDisputeGame. Variant for chains using OPSuccinct (SP1) games instead of Cannon, which omits Cannon-specific cross-contract fields (vm, oracle, weth, challengePeriod, absolutePrestate from game).
The MIPS contract is used to execute the final step of the dispute game which objectively determines the winner of the dispute.
Logic of the dispute game. When a state rootA cryptographic hash succinctly representing a state using a Merkle tree. is proposed, a dispute game contract is deployed. Challengers can use such contracts to challenge the proposed state root.
A helper contract that generates OptimismMintableERC20 contracts on the networkA constellation of nodes (peers) that communicate via a peer-to-peer protocol, for example, in propagating transactions and blocks to other nodes. it’s deployed to. OptimismMintableERC20 is a standard extension of the base ERC20 token contract designed to allow the L1StandardBridge contracts to mint and burn tokens. This makes it possible to use an OptimismMintableERC20 as this chain’s representation of a token on the host chain, or vice-versa.
Contract designed to hold the bonded ETH for each game. It is designed as a wrapper around WETH to allow an owner to function as a backstop if a game would incorrectly distribute funds.
Contract managing access control for proposers and challengers in OPSuccinct.
VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contract for SP1 proofs (v5.0.0).
This contract is the router for zk proof verification. It stores the mapping between identifiers and the address of onchain verifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contracts, routing each identifier to the corresponding verifier contract.
VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contract for SP1 proofs (v6.0.0).
VerifierAn entity in a ZK-Rollup, often a smart contract, that verifies zero-knowledge proofs submitted by a prover. contract for SP1 proofs (v6.1.0).
The current deployment carries some associated risks:
Funds can be stolen if a contract receives a malicious code upgrade. There is no delay on code upgrades (CRITICAL).